Numerous movements in the human history have shaped the society into what it is today, each bringing about a new way of thinking, specific reforms in their respective fields, and pathways towards improved governance. The 20th century bore witness to many of these movements, especially around the two world wars that influenced the world's historical, socioeconomic, and geopolitical landscapes. These massive responses, or movements, were spread across all disciplines of human philosophy; politics, history, literature, and art. The Dada movement originated in 19th-century Europe and was an art movement that gave rise to various styles, techniques, and tones to different aesthetics of that time. This article will look at the Dada movement and attempt to associate it with Liberalism.
Dadaism
Dadaism was an artistic and cultural movement that formally arose in Zurich, Switzerland, in the early 20th century. It was part of the European Avante-Garde and flourished across the regions till the mid-1920s. It quickly grasped onto some areas of North America, like New York, along with major cities in Europe, like Paris, where it began spreading in earnest. The movement is characterised by the absolute rejection of logic and social convention. It was developed in reaction to the first world war, and the artists expressed complete denial of reason and aestheticism of modern capitalist society. Their works revolved around non-sensical characters or figures, portraying irrationality, non-sensical dimensions, and anti-bourgeois sentiment.
The inception of the first world war left the world in complete disarray and demonstrated large-scale violence. The Dada movement rose out of contempt for how the world was going to war and primarily sought to protest against the bourgeois, nationalist, and imperialist goals, which many Dadaists claimed were at the root of the conflict, as well as to the cultural and intellectual conformity that accompanied it, both in art and in society as a whole. It included renowned artists such as Pablo Picasso, Marcel Duchamp, and Tristan Tzara.
Dadaist art incorporated paintings, sculptures, poetry, collage, and any other form of visual or auditory media, which, in form, did not fall under the socially accepted idea of art. It was, in fact, the artists' aim to create "anti-art" in response to the frustration they were facing in terms of the world sliding into violence and chaos. They reciprocated with turmoil in the artistic world, twisting words and the conservative idea of art into non-sensical styles, which was symbolic of the discomfort and tearing apart of the horizontally tiered system of social hierarchy.
Dadaism is, by definition, a movement connecting groups of people defending common goals or interests. As a result, we must comprehend it in terms of its dynamics and the context of local circumstances. Dada is typically addressed in relation to its many sites and situations, but the reason the groups embraced the common term was almost certainly because their members thought it made sense, and it freed them from formal rules and restrictions. The works of dadaists also incorporated the addition of everyday objects to create something in which the objects are placed in an unusual way or position, like the examples given below. It could be a symbol of questioning the mundaneness of the world and the life we lead.
The Dada Movement and Liberalism
Dadaism sought to engage in deviation from socially constructed norms and artistic expressions of unorthodoxy. The liberalistic feature of communicating noninterference and independent streams of thought aligns with the dadaistic concept of non-conformity. Dadaism radically reimagined the social nature of language, artistic dialogue, and new avenues of expressionism through the liberty of individualistic thought. The liberal set of minds heeded the freedom of expression, and the dada movement resulted from frustration towards the nationalistic ideals that eventually culminated in war. To associate Liberalism and the Dada movement, one could say that the liberal set of ideologies pertaining to the belief that anything can be possible and contribute to society played a significant role in giving the Dada movement a certain momentum, which it otherwise would have lacked. The liberal ideology sustained the supposedly non-sensical movement. Its more complex tenets help us understand why the Dada movement was an essential response to the war-torn world.
Conclusion
To conclude, it is imperative to note that while the Dada movement culminated in a whole ideology called Dadaism, it is one of the movements that aptly portrayed the very meaninglessness of conflict and war. More discourses and academic literature needs to be inculcated to gain a holistic understanding of the minute specifics of Dadaism, but it is safe to say that it has borrowed from Liberalism in a significant sense, providing us with the tools to reimagine society as what it could be, without the toils of war and violence. It has also played an instrumental role in simultaneously bringing about a sense of randomness and emptiness. Dadaism was, and remains to this day, one of the most unique responses to war, choosing art over violence and art again against bloodshed.
Comments